Was Virginia Giuffre really a victim of Epstein's evil cabal, or a profiteer? A legal case soon to be heard will put her on trial even from the grave to establish if she is a liar.
The recent publication of Virginia Giuffre's book about her experiences as a trafficked sex worker of the former disgraced financier Jeffry Epstein has caused a storm on both sides of the Atlantic, but more so in the UK where the royal formerly known as Prince Andrew, has been stripped of all his royal pomp and is about to be evicted from the royal mansion.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
The case in the U.S. is causing real problems for the Trumps, which I have elaborated on in earlier pieces, namely that Melania's association with Epstein will create major political problems for the U.S. president if awkward questions are raised about her legal immigration status in the U.S. at the time of meeting the Donald, not to mention just how close she was to Epstein himself. Bluntly, this is a legal nightmare for the Trumps who have not sought good legal advice but have made the ratcheted razor chains even tighter on themselves as they try and stifle free speech and old fashioned journalism which should ask tough questions.
But as many pundits in the UK now predict that it's only a matter of time before the U.S. justice system catches up with Andrew Windsor, his legal team might seek some solace with the emergence of an Epstein victim who questions the validity of Giuffre's claims: Rina Ho.
Ho cannot be described in the same salacious way as Giuffre as she claims she did not receive money from Epstein for any of the favours - whatever they may be - that were required of her, although she admits to allowing Epstein to help her with her dream of being an artist.
Ho doesn't consider herself to be a typical victim like other young women and so took great exception in Giuffre's book to be accused of being the one who recruited her to be a trafficked sex worker. Although Giuffre died in April of this year, the defamation case that Ho has filed against her will still continue to go ahead as state laws do not limit such cases to the living but extend them to the defendant's estate. The case itself if interesting as Ho will have to prove to a U.S. court that Giuffre is a liar and a profiteer who has essentially weaponized her victim status and made good out of it, by scandalous book deals with sensational allegations against the rich and famous. And she might well have a case as, against the common narrative followed by legacy media, Giuffre is hardly the naïve teen who was exploited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein.
We are lead to believe that a girl at the young age of 17 can get confused about huge amounts of cash being given to her to perform the role of travelling sex worker for the world's celebrities and elite types, being flown across the Atlantic in a private jet. Some would argue though that Giuffre was paid handsomely for her services as, in the case of Andrew, it was later revealed through court documents that she was paid 15,000 USD for the three separate locations where she claims she was 'forced' to have sex with him - London, New York and Epstein's island. Others might add that given that she did very well out of subsequent legal cases - at least 500,000 USD paid to her by Epstein (perhaps more over a longer period from his estate) - and a whacking 16 MILLION dollars paid out to her by the former British royal that the label 'victim' is starting to wear thin and that she is actually a savvy-minded opportunist who no one actually took advantage of at all. Was she really a victim?