BELÉM, BRAZIL -- Rumors of the global "climate" regime's demise have been greatly exaggerated. While U.S. President Donald Trump's boycott of the United Nations COP30 climate summit knocked some of the wind out of the global-warming movement's sails this year, schemes to undermine national sovereignty, individual liberty, and Western economic prosperity still advanced in a major way. The globalist plan is to simply keep moving, mostly under the radar, and wait out Trump's final term.
Under the guise of climate "adaptation," the final agreement included a call for tripling the amount of wealth redistributed from taxpayers in wealthier nations to kleptocrats in poorer ones. All governments aside from the United States also renewed their total commitment to the Paris Accord and the broader UN fight against CO emissions, which the UN claims drive warming. And a new set of "global indicators" to "track progress" on "climate" was enshrined into this year's deal, too.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
However, much of the most significant "progress" at this year's summit took the form of supplemental agreements approved by coalitions of governments outside the formal Conference of the Parties (COP) system. Everything from full-blown censorship of "misinformation" to globalizing "carbon markets" and "phasing out fossil fuels" was enshrined in separate deals. These deals brought together informal groupings of governments and dictatorships anxious to move faster than the rest.
Much of the sparse U.S. press and most of the tax-funded "Rent-a-Mob" Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) portrayed the summit as essentially a failure. Their argument was simple: the "climate crisis" is so serious and so severe that only a much more rapid shift away from hydrocarbon ("fossil fuel") energy and into global "carbon markets" to charge people for their emissions of CO will suffice in saving "Mother Earth."
The COP30 did take baby steps in that direction. But with Trump ridiculing the "hoax" and even suggesting those involved in the climate "conspiracy" may be prosecuted while even alarmist billionaire Bill Gates toned down the hysteria, the "progress" made was not "enough" for those seeking faster empowerment of the UN's climate regime. This same general argument is made every year -- even when the summit takes a giant leap forward.
The final agreement is bold. In addition to demanding $1.3 trillion per year by 2035, the deal -- dubbed the global "Mutirão," an indigenous term for cooperation -- repeatedly touts globalism and even "the critical role of multilateralism based on United Nations values and principles." Over and over again, the agreement celebrates the "centrality of international cooperation" in battling the supposed threat of alleged man-made global warming.
Perhaps even more concerning is the discussion of the UN-backed "carbon budget." The deal claims humans have already emitted four fifths of the allowable budget. That means under this vision, the UN and its members will eventually have to forcibly limit human activity that releases CO under the guise of stopping temperature changes. Indeed, the deal calls for "deep, rapid and sustained reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions."
Of course, every human activity including breathing releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, human emissions of CO -- known to serious scientists as the "gas of life" -- represent a fraction of one percent of all the greenhouse gases present naturally in the atmosphere. Leading scientists such as Dr. William Happer, who served as Trump's climate advisor during his first term, have told The New American that more CO would be good for the world.
In a little-noticed but highly consequential section of the COP30 agreement, negotiators quietly advanced what critics warn is a blueprint for expanded global governance under the banner of "implementation." Beyond the headline promises, the final deal locks nations into an intricate web of 59 new "global adaptation indicators," mandatory reporting cycles, gender-based "climate assessments," and cross-border monitoring frameworks designed to measure compliance with future climate obligations.
Taken together, these mechanisms shift the UN process from aspirational goal-setting into a far more intrusive evaluation and enforcement phase. Over time, these schemes could empower UN agencies, development banks, and transnational climate bodies to collect data, rate national performance, and even shape domestic policy through funding conditions and "technical assistance."
By embedding these standardized metrics into national government's planning, the final COP30 deal effectively builds the scaffolding for a permanent international oversight regime. For now, the actual "emission" targets and finance pledges remain relatively vague and non-specific. But there is always next year's COP, or the one after that, or even one after Trump leaves office.