Phobos Topography Studying with Tether System in Elliptic Restricted Three-Body Problem | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets


Phobos Topography Studying with Tether System in Elliptic Restricted Three-Body Problem | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets

The paper discusses the possibility of realizing a spacecraft-tether mission to study the surface of Phobos within the framework of the planar elliptic restricted three-body problem taking into account the topography of Phobos. The tether system is a weightless and inextensible tether with an instrument unit attached to it to study the surface of Phobos. Control laws of the tether length during deployment, the envelopment of the lunar surface by the instrument unit, and the retraction of the tether system into the spacecraft are considered. The spacecraft is located in a low quasi-satellite orbit of Phobos. Four different altitude quasi-satellite orbits are analyzed with respect to the possibility to study the Phobos topography by means of the tether system. Numerical modeling confirms the effectiveness of the chosen nonlinear control laws of the tether system at all stages of motion.

[1] Albee A. L., Palluconi F. D. and Arvidson R. E., "Mars Global Surveyor Mission: Overview and Status," Science, Vol. 279, No. 5357, 1998, pp. 1671-1672. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5357.1671 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[2] Zurek R. W. and Smrekar S. E., "An Overview of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) Science Mission," Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, Vol. 112, No. E5, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JE002701 Google Scholar

[3] Marov M. Y., "Phobos-Grunt: Russian Sample Return Mission," Advances in Space Research, Vol. 33, No. 12, 2004, pp. 2276-2280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00515-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[4] Dobrovolskiy A. R. and Burns J. A., "Life Near the Roche Limit: Behavior of Ejecta from Satellites Close to Planets," Icarus, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1980, pp. 422-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(80)90105-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[5] Wiesel E. W., "Stable Orbits About the Martian Moons," Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1993, pp. 434-440. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21028 LinkGoogle Scholar

[6] Baresi N., Dell'Elce L., Cardoso dos Santos J. and Kawakatsu Y., "Long-Term Evolution of Mid-Altitude Quasi-Satellite Orbits," Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 99, No. 4, 2020, pp. 2743-2763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05344-4 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[7] Baresi N., Dell'Elce L., Cardoso dos Santos J. and Kawakatsu Y., "Orbit Maintenance of Quasi-Satellite Trajectories via Mean Relative Orbit Elements," Proceedings of the 69th International Astronautical Congress, Bremen, Germany, Oct. 2018. Google Scholar

[8] Baresi N., Diogene A., Tos Dei, Ikeda H. and Kawakatsu Y., "Trajectory Design and Maintenance of the Martian Moons eXploration Mission Around Phobos," Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2020, pp. 996-1007. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005041 LinkGoogle Scholar

[9] Lara M., "Design of Quasi-Satellite Orbits: Analytical Alternatives," International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, Engineers Australia, Melbourne, 2019, pp. 1674-1685, https://doi/abs/10.3316/informit.326939818512964. Google Scholar

[10] Carletta S., Pontani M. and Teofilatto P., "Characterization of Low-Energy Quasiperiodic Orbits in the Elliptic Restricted 4-Body Problem with Orbital Resonance," Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2022, p. 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9040175 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[11] Ershkov S., Leshchenko D. and Prosviryakov E. Y., "Semi-Analytical Approach in BiER4BP for Exploring the Stable Positioning of the Elements of a Dyson Sphere," Symmetry, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2023, p. 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020326 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[12] Kuramoto K., Kawakatsu Y., Fujimoto M., Araya A., Barucci M. A., Genda H., Hirata N., Ikeda H., Imamura T., Helbert J. and et al., "Martian Moons Exploration MMX: Sample Return Mission to Phobos Elucidating Formation Processes of Habitable Planets," Earth Planets and Space, Vol. 74, No. 1, 2022, pp. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01545-7 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[13] Beletsky V. V. and Levin E. V., Dynamics of Space Tether Systems, Univelt, San Diego, CA, 1993. Google Scholar

[14] Levin E. M., Dynamic Analysis of Space Tether Missions, Univelt, San Diego, CA, 2007. Google Scholar

[15] Aslanov V. S. and Ledkov A. S., Dynamics of Tethered Satellite Systems, Woodhead Publ., Cambridge, England, U.K., 2012. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[16] Cartmell M. P. and McKenzie D. J., "A Review of Space Tether Research," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.08.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[17] Huang P., Zhang F., Chen L., Meng Z., Zhang Y., Liu Z. and Hu Y., "A Review of Space Tether in New Applications," Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4389-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[18] Aslanov V. S., "A Double Pendulum Fixed at the L1 Libration Point: A Precursor to a Mars-Phobos Space Elevator," Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 112, No. 2, 2024, pp. 775-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09108-z CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[19] Aslanov V. S. and Ledkov A. S., "Swing Principle in Tether-Assisted Return Mission from an Elliptical Orbit," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 71, Sept. 2017, pp. 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.09.006 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[20] Aslanov V. S. and Ledkov A. S., "Survey of Tether System Technology for Space Debris Removal Missions," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 60, No. 5, 2023, pp. 1355-1371. LinkGoogle Scholar

[21] Huang J. and Misra A. K., "Controlled Deployment of a Long Tether to Operate as a Partial Space Elevator," Astrodynamics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2024, pp. 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-024-0225-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[22] Ledkov A. S. and Pikalov R. S., "Nonlinear Control of Tether Retrieval in an Elliptical Orbit," Russian Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2023, pp. 201-218. https://doi.org/10.20537/nd230401 Google Scholar

[23] Wang C., Wang P., Li A. and Guo Y., "Deployment of Tethered Satellites in Low-Eccentricity Orbits Using Adaptive Sliding Mode Control," Journal Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2017, Paper 04017077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000793 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[24] Wang W., Wu Z. and Liu J., "Dynamic Analysis of Cislunar Suspension Tether Swings," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 216, Jan. 2024, pp. 350-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.01.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[25] Yu B. S. and Zhu Z. H., "Symmetric and Asymmetric Dynamics of a Tethered Satellite in Nontypical Planes," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 202, Nov. 2023, pp. 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.11.019 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[26] Luo C., Wen H., Jin D. and Sun J., "Retargeting Control of a Multi-Tethered Satellite Formation at Sun-Earth Libration Point," Advances in Space Research, Vol. 70, No. 2, 2022, pp. 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.03.040 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[27] Aslanov V. S., "Tether System in Martian-Moons-eXploration-Like Mission for Phobos Surface Exploration," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2024, pp. 319-326. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A35777 LinkGoogle Scholar

[28] Szebehely V., Theory of Orbits: the Restricted Three-Body Problem, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1967. Google Scholar

[29] Kluever C. A., Space Flight Dynamics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2018. Google Scholar

[30] Scheeres D. J., Olikara Z. and Baresi N., "Dynamics in the Phobos Environment," Advances in Space Research, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2019, pp. 476-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.10.016 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[31] Chen H., Hou X. and Bando M., "Towards Stable Orbiting Around Small Moons Using the J2-Perturbed Elliptic-Restricted Three-Body Problem," Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 47, No. 7, 2023, pp. 1327-1340. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G008001 LinkGoogle Scholar

[32] Rambaux N., Castillo-Rogez J. C., Le Maistre S. and Rosenblatt P., "Rotational Motion of Phobos," Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 548, No. 548, 2012, p. A14. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219710 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[33] Wählisch M., Willner K., Oberst J., Matz K.-D., Scholten F., Roatsch T., Hoffmann H., Semm S. and Neukum G., "A New Topographic Image Atlas of Phobos," Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 294, Nos. 3-4, 2010, pp. 547-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.003 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[34] Kuzmin R. O., Shingareva T. V. and Zabalueva E. V., "An Engineering Model for the Phobos Surface," Solar System Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2003, pp. 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025074114117 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[35] Basilevsky A. T., Lorenz C. A., Shingareva T. V., Head J. W., Ramsley K. R. and Zubarev A. E., "The Surface Geology and Geomorphology of Phobos," Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 102, April 2014, pp. 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2014.04.013 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[36] Karachevtseva I. P., Oberst J., Zubarev D. V., Nadezhdina I. E., Kokhanov A. A., Garov A. S., Uchaev D. V., Malinnikov VA. and Klimkin N. D., "The Phobos Information System," Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 102, Jan. 2014, pp. 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.12.015 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[37] Nakamura T., Ikeda H., Kouyama T., Nakagawa H., Kusano H., Senshu H., Kameda S., Matsumoto K., Gonzalez-Franquesa F., Ozaki N. and et al., "Science Operation Plan of Phobos and Deimos from the MMX Spacecraft," Earth Planets and Space, Vol. 73, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01546-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Previous articleNext article

POPULAR CATEGORY

misc

18088

entertainment

19461

corporate

16261

research

9989

wellness

16153

athletics

20533