If there was any doubt the current U.S. administration is the world's greatest threat to action on climate change, President Donald Trump removed it when he addressed the U.N. and called climate change "the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world" and a threat promoted by "stupid people."
He went on to ridicule Europe for reducing its carbon footprint by 37% and to extol the virtues of "clean, beautiful coal." That's pretty clear cut, as is the threat of climate change.
So what are the vast majority of nations that recognize the threat of climate change going to do? So far the answer turns out to be "very little," but the international community could do something, and soon.
Those nations that assembled at the U.N. have a weapon at their disposal that could bring the U.S. back into the fold, a weapon enthusiastically endorsed by Trump, that could be deployed rapidly and would be simple to administer.
Earlier in 2025, a U.N. agency took a tentative step in the direction of global action on climate change by proposing a fee on fossil fuel emissions from ships involved in global trade, a proposal the organization was supposed to formally adopt this fall.
Even this timid step -- shipping accounts for only 1.4% of those emissions -- provoked immediate threats from the Trump administration to impose tariffs or sanction nations that signed on.
The threats worked -- the fractious meeting ended with the vote postponed for a year -- but there's an easy way to counter these threats and make a meaningful reduction in global emissions.
The international community could agree to a universal tariff on nations that fail to reduce their annual emissions by a specified amount. The Trump administration's divide-and-conquer bluster would not work on an internationally agreed-upon tariff; he can't impose sanctions on the entire global community, or if he did, the pain would largely be felt by the U.S. itself.
Tariffs could be administered by the World Trade Organization, which has already declared climate change an issue to address. Money collected could help poor nations achieve reductions. Such a tariff would represent action at scale, would be simple to administer and wouldn't involve the endless, complex negotiations that have neutered every previous climate change initiative.
A universal tariff is a low-hanging fruit on the climate action tree. Keeping temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, the first danger point specified by the Paris Agreement, is basically a lost cause. The world will see a continued rise in economic and social damages inflicted by extreme storms, droughts, floods, temperatures and wildfires. It might still be possible, however, to prevent that rise from continuing to accelerate.
Reducing global emissions represents an opportunity for the greatest economic stimulus program of all time as the world shifts its energy base away from fossil fuels and adjusts to climate realities.
No global climate action will be possible without playing hardball with the Trump administration, because any climate action will be nullified if the world's largest economy uses its might to counter those efforts.
Trump might believe he delivered a triumphant and dominant message to the world leaders gathered at the U.N., but the messages received were very different. One of the loudest was that the U.S. government is going to do everything it can to hasten a climate disaster. If that doesn't galvanize the international community, nothing will, and the world will continue to hurtle toward its appointment with climate destiny.
Eugene Linden is the author of "Fire & Flood: A People's History of Climate Change From 1979 to the Present."